Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] Rules to modify/create ontologies from ontologies?
alanruttenberg at gmail.com
Thu Oct 2 03:10:34 PDT 2008
You might look at GONG - http://www.gong.manchester.ac.uk/
There is the OWL API, which can be used to read and write ontologies - It's
a java library.
I use a lisp based tool called LSW which is based JENA and Pellet to do
things like this - a combination of SPARQL queries and direct reasoner
queries, followed by construction of OWL statements based on it.
As an example, see
This file generates an anonymous individual that is an instance of each
class that has no subclasses.
This file creates disjoint class assertions based on OBI's policy.
Hope this helps,
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Johann Petrak <johann.petrak at chello.at>wrote:
> Since I got no answer yet I will broaden my question:
> what ways exist to systematically change or merge
> the knowledge in one or more ontologies into
> a new ontology?
> Is the only way to do this to hand-code it or
> do tool or more formal, e.g. rule-based, approaches
> I'd highly apreciate any feedback about this, even
> if it is not a solution -- I'd also apreciate hearing
> from people who face similar problems.
> On 09/29/2008 04:24 PM, Johann Petrak wrote:
> > I am wondering if there is some high-level, possibly rule-based
> > way (as opposed to hacking it in Java or similar) to modify
> > an ontology or create a new ontology from an existing one.
> > Here is the background and motivation: I have a process that
> > creates an ontology automatically and due to the sequential
> > process and other factors, the created ontology has several
> > problems that need to be fixed:
> > - several individuals might turn out to be known to be different or equal
> > - properties might need processing and get split up or merged into
> > other properties, or data properties might need to get converted
> > into one or more object properties filled with individuals that
> > need to created or modified.
> > - one or more individuals might need to get converted into
> > individuals of a different class (representing a different
> > abstraction layer).
> > - etc.
> > For all these actions that would modify the ontology or
> > create a new one there exists a domain theory that could
> > be represented in a rule language where the rule head
> > matches conditions in the original ontology and the
> > rule body is a sequence of operations on property values
> > and on the target ontology.
> > Does anyone know about a way to (at least partly) achieve
> > this or about people who work on similar things?
> > Are there others who want to solve this or similar problems?
> > And as usual: are you aware of other forums, mailing lists
> > or places on the internet were questions like this one
> > can be discussed?
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the protege-owl