Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] SQWRL query help needed
martin.oconnor at stanford.edu
Mon Oct 27 10:43:28 PDT 2008
Quoting Przemek W <teonacatl at tlen.pl>:
> Yes. I've realised that. But what should I use instead?
wine:Wine(?wine:x) ∧ wine:hasSugar(?wine:x, ?y) ^ wine:Dry(?y)→
> And btw I have another question: Can these queries return answers ONLY about
> assertions? I've just realised that, when running the query it returns the
> correct answers, if they were originaly defined in the Ontology. For example
> there's just one kind of White Wine, and query's result is THAT ONE
> PARTICULAR wine(which is OK, i think?). But after running reasoner, there
> appear to be many more INFERRED White Wines(marked in hierarchy as blue).
> But query still returns THE SAME ONE white wine.
SQWRL does not currently return reasoner-inferred knowledge. I plan to
fix this shortcoming in the next few months.
More information about the protege-owl