Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] Protege 3.4 SWRL tbox:notEqualTo Problem

Tiffani Bright msnyc4 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 13 19:52:15 PST 2009


Martin O'Connor wrote:
> The next relase (which would be available today or early next week) has 
> implementations for tbox:equalTo and tbox:notEqualTo.
>
> Martin
>
> Martin O'Connor wrote:
>
>   
>> I'll try to release implementations of these built-ins in the next month 
>> or so.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> Tiffani Bright wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>     
>>> Thank you Thomas for your response. The error message seemed odd since 
>>> the tbox OWL file that is imported in to Protege 3.4 defines 
>>> notEqualTo and the built-in is available in SQWRL. Would you happen to 
>>> know when the built-in will be implemented? Thanks again.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Thomas Russ <tar at isi.edu 
>>> <mailto:tar at isi.edu>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>    On Dec 30, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Tiffani Bright wrote:
>>>
>>>    > Hello,
>>>    >
>>>    > I'm using Protege 3.4 (build 516) and when I execute a SQWRL rule
>>>    > using the tbox built-in tbox:notEqualTo I receive an error (same
>>>    > problem with equalTo). I do not experience this problem when using
>>>    > other tbox built-ins such as tbox:isDirectSubClassOf. I am
>>>    > importing the tbox OWL file
>>>    fromhttp://swrl.stanford.edu/ontologies/
>>>    <http://swrl.stanford.edu/ontologies/>
>>>    > built-ins/3.3/tbox.owl. I would appreciate all thoughts.
>>>
>>>    Careful reading of the error message tells you that the built-in is
>>>    not implemented yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>    > Here's the error I receive when executing the rule in the SWRL tab:
>>>    >
>>>    > Exception running SQWRL queries: error running SQWRL queries: Jess
>>>    > reported an error in routine invokeSWRLBuiltIn
>>>    > [snip]
>>>    > Message: error invoking built-in from Jess: exception thrown by
>>>    > built-in 'tbox:notEqualTo' in rule 'http://www.owl-ontologies.com/
>>>    > Rule-21-UTI_CAP_All': built-in not yet implemented.
>>>
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    protege-owl mailing list
>>>    protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu <mailto:protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu>
>>>    https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
>>>
>>>    Instructions for unsubscribing:
>>>    http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> protege-owl mailing list
>>> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
>>>
>>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>>>
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-owl mailing list
>> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>>
>>  
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03 
>
>   
Martin, thanks again for this implementation. I just had a second to 
test the equalTo and notEqualTo implementations in my rules and 
everything is perfect!

-- Tiffani



More information about the protege-owl mailing list