Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] Ontology visualization
juliadmtr at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 14:21:07 PDT 2009
Thank you Eddy for reaction.
I think now that I need to implement it
also without reasoner, because very frequently
people make inconsistent ontologies at the beginning.
Could you explain more clearly what you mean with " re-initialize".
With best regards,
2009/3/11 Eddy Vanderlinden <info at fadyart.com>:
> Hello Julia,
> You did a fantastic job !
> I tried with my own ontology and you program found it was not was not
> Indeed, Pellet 1.5 does not find it coherent, I'll adapt it in a while. For
> FaCT++ it's coherent however.
> So, I tried with an older version, coherent for Pellet topot, and the
> result was very good.
> (Vista business with Java 6)
> Perhaps 1 hint: if possible forressee a way to re-initialize (unless it's
> there and I didn't find it).
> I would like to contact you later to check wether, and under which
> conditions, I could put it on my website.
> To me, as simple user, not developper in Protégé, it is not necessary to
> have it encapsuled in Protégé when it is available as standalone or as
> Meanwhile, congratulations and success !
> Kind regards
> Eddy Vanderlinden
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
More information about the protege-owl