Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] Unique cannonical serialization (using Subversion or some such)
tudorache at stanford.edu
Wed Mar 18 16:14:02 PDT 2009
I'm wondering if Eric forgot to check the "Sort alphabetically" check
box. That would explain the many differences when using the native writer.
In any case, Protege 4 is the way to go.
Thomas Russ wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Eric Peterson wrote:
>>> Instead, you can use the native writer which you can configure from
>>> menu -> Preferences -> Experimental native writer. If you will also
>>> enable the 'Sort resources alphabetically' checkbox, then the output
>>> will be repeatable across different Protege work sessions.
>> I tried this and had about 1700 diffs resulting from about 30
>> additive edits on my part and a handful on my colleagues part. But
>> maybe you didn't mean that this was sufficient for a total solution.
> Wow, was it really that bad?
> I might have expected something like that for the change-over from the
> Jena writer to the experimental one, but not for diffs from just the
> experimental writer.
> Oh, well. I'm glad you found a solution with Protege 4.
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
More information about the protege-owl