Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] SPARQL & OWL
coolmurali1220 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 11 13:30:02 PDT 2010
hello sir, i dont want any replies from u..so plese dont hesitate me by
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Kendall Clark <kendall at clarkparsia.com>wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:06 PM,
> <protege-owl-request at lists.stanford.edu> wrote:
> > On Apr 10, 2010, at 5:52 AM, samn wrote:
> >> Why I didn't get the inferred individuals when running SPARQL in
> Protege? Do
> > Because SPARQL only operates on the underlying RDF structure. It doesn't
> understand any of the semantics of OWL.
> > If you search back through earlier posts you will see a fair bit of
> discussion about the limitations of using SPARQL as a query language for
> > I suggest looking at SQWRL instead.
> It is increasingly less true that SPARQL doesn't understand OWL, at
> least in the context of Pellet. The new 2.1 release -- which also has
> Protege 4 and 4.1 plugin support -- takes account of OWL DL entailment
> regimes to do more than operate on the literal RDF structure. It also
> introduces a new syntax, Terp, which combines Turtle and Manchester so
> that it's much easier to write SPARQL queries for OWL now. See
> http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2010/04/01/pellet21-terp/ for some
> The next release will include some kind of Protege plugin support so
> that Terp can be used directly in Protege 4.1.
> Kendall Clark
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the protege-owl