Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] Applying SWRL rule
miha.gresak at gmail.com
Tue Apr 27 10:00:27 PDT 2010
My SWRL looks like this:
helpSt:teaches(?x, ?y) ∧ helpSt:contains(?y, ?z) → helpSt:knows(?x, ?z)
(this means: profesor teaches a school subject AND school subject contains
knowledge THEN profesor knows the knowledge)
Is my logic ok?
2010/4/27 William Koscho <wkoscho at gmail.com>
> Can you share the SWRL rule and related parts of the ontology?
> perhaps the rule is not firing as expected, which is causing your
> query to not return results.
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Miha Grešak <miha.gresak at gmail.com>
> > Hello,
> > I wrote a simple SWRL rule in Protege 3.4.4 and I tick a checkbox
> > next to it but the rule does not apply on my ontology (sparql query does
> > return values as it should).
> > What should I do to make it work?
> > Thanks,
> > Miha
> > _______________________________________________
> > protege-owl mailing list
> > protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
> > Instructions for unsubscribing:
> > http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the protege-owl