Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] Different results when running SQWRL-query in protege and in own programm using protege jars

Martin O'Connor martin.oconnor at stanford.edu
Thu Aug 5 09:50:42 PDT 2010


The same API are used by both approaches. Can you send me a small, 
standalone ontology that demonstrates this problem.

Martin

Michael Lodemann wrote:
>  Hello Protégé team,
>
> as the title says I'm a bit confused about different query results
> within protege 3.4.4 and a java program using the the same jars from
> protege 3.4.4.
> Of course I'm using the same ontology in both cases.
>
> In the program the queries ae executed using
> queryEngine.runSQWRLQueries();
>
> and the results are obtained using
> SQWRLResult result = queryEngine.getSQWRLResult(rule);
>
> Is this the same way protege does the query processing?
> Has anyone got a clue how this different behaviour happens and how to
> avoid it?
>
> Regards,
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>   




More information about the protege-owl mailing list