Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] Jess rules from Protege OWL
martin.oconnor at stanford.edu
Sat Jan 9 08:59:43 PST 2010
Did you use the owl:AllDifferents axiom to assert that the child individuals are different?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hailin Wang" <whlsx62 at gmail.com>
To: protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2010 1:57:20 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal
Subject: [protege-owl] Jess rules from Protege OWL
I have a question to ask you.
I have installed Protege OWL Editor 3.4. and added Jess 7.1p1. I
successfully activated the SWRL Jess Tab in Protege; rules and axioms
import to Jess as well. But when I test Jess inference engine by using
the following rule:
Person(?y) ∧ hasChild(?y, ?x) ∧ hasChild(?y, ?z) ∧
differentFrom(?x, ?z) → hasSibling(?x, ?z),
the inference gives no results. If I remove 'differentFrom' predicate,
the rule works. Certainly it returns some extra axioms like
I conclude that restriction 'differentFrom' does not work despite is
importing without error messages. Could you tell me what my problem
Thank you for your consideration. I am looking forward to hear from your soon.
Happy New Year!
protege-owl mailing list
protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
More information about the protege-owl