Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] Protégé-owl quetions?
houakh at gmail.com
Sun Jan 17 01:15:09 PST 2010
Thank you Samson for your response,
2010/1/16 Samson Tu <swt at stanford.edu>
> On 1/13/2010 6:38 PM, Timothy Redmond wrote:
> Protege Frames is based on an older ontology language. The Protege
>> frames ontology language is applicable in some situations where OWL is
>> difficult to apply (e.g. the closed world assumption but this is whole
>> different story). But the major disadvantage of the Protege frames
>> language is that it is not standardized and there is no semantics. I
>> think that the presence of a standard is very important and would
>> recommend OWL over frames.
> I would say that an exception to the OWL recommendation is the situation
> where (1) you are not using description logic, and (2) you are creating and
> managing a lot of instance data in Protege. Protege-frame has better support
> for instance management.
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the protege-owl