Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] Ontology reuse

fariz darari capucinnolover at gmail.com
Fri Nov 12 02:52:24 PST 2010


I'm afraid the benefits are less than the disadvantages. The OWL-Full will
make your ontology undecidable. It will be hard to be reasoned by any
inference systems.

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Dário Abdulrehman
<dario.rehman at gmail.com>wrote:

> I would like to annotate an information system front end in the Biology
> domain with RDFa.
>
> There seems to be two ways to do it:
>
> 1. Create an ontology specifically for this purpose where I can create
> terms (classes) such as GeneDescription along with data properties that
> describe a gene (standard name, gene sequence, etc.), and use this terms to
> annotate the XHTML code.
>
> 2. Reuse terms from existing vocabularies: it is difficult to find terms
> that are exactly appropriate (I used the http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ search
> engine), sometimes it is not possible to find them, or I end up annotating
> elements in the XHTML interface related with the same class with terms
> coming from different vocabularies, which results in a messy "ontology". In
> this case, where terms come from different ontologies the resulting
> (implicit?) merged ontology can even be inconsistent.  I found a Protégé
> plugin for ontology reuse Prosé
> http://krono.act.uji.es/people/Ernesto/safety-ontology-reuse, but it seems
> to be non-trivial to use.
>
> Since the main goal of using ontologies is the ability to perform inference
> (if you keep them in OWL-DL) it seems to be a very difficult task to reuse
> ontologies while keeping up with this restrictions.
>
> Are there any benefits in providing RDFa annotations if the resulting RDF
> is in RDFS/OWL-Full?
>
> I am more inclined to follow the approach 1, even though the effort to
> build a new ontology is big, it seems to be even harder to reuse existing
> ontologies.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Fariz Darari
Universitas Indonesia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-owl/attachments/20101112/8603354d/attachment.html>


More information about the protege-owl mailing list