Search Mailing List Archives


Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort
Limit to: All This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
Select Date Range     through    

[protege-owl] Different individual with same name

fariz darari capucinnolover at gmail.com
Wed Nov 24 11:35:51 PST 2010


I'm agree with Thomas Russ..by common-sense semantics, every district is not
a province. the correct relation is "every district is a part of a province"

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Thomas Russ <tar at isi.edu> wrote:

>
> On Nov 24, 2010, at 12:21 AM, Tran Binh wrote:
>
>  I have create one class named "province" and one subclass of it named
>> "district".
>>
>
> Just on another note, I'm not sure this is really what you mean.
>
> Is every district a province?  That is the meaning of using subclass.
>
> Later on you correctly relate the provinces and districts using a different
> property (hasPart).  That suggests to me that Province and District are not
> subclasses of each other, but rather different types of government bodies.
>
> A proper use of subclass might be to have province with a subclass for
> coastal-province.  But districts and provinces are, I think, disjoint
> classes rather than child and parent classes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing:
> http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
>



-- 
Regards,
Fariz Darari
Universitas Indonesia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-owl/attachments/20101125/124078f4/attachment.html>


More information about the protege-owl mailing list