Search Mailing List Archives
[protege-owl] distinguish between "inferred individuals" from "asserted individuals"
martin.oconnor at stanford.edu
Wed Feb 1 13:58:44 PST 2012
There is no way do distinguish between asserted and SWRL-inferred individuals in Protege 3.
BTW, I would upgrade to the latest 3.4.8; 3.4.4 is quite old by now.
On 1/31/2012 5:21 AM, samane abdi wrote:
> Dear Experts,
> I am designing an ontology in protege 3.4.4. I am wondering is there a way to distinguish between "inferred
> individuals" from "asserted individuals" of a class within SWRL rule?
> For example: Class A has individuals "a,b,c" where individual "a" is asserted individual and individuals "b and c" are
> inferred individuals from a subclass, say Class B. The goal is to define a property relation (for example: "implies")
> between asserted individuals and inferred individuals such that "a implies b" and "a implies C"?
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl at lists.stanford.edu
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03
More information about the protege-owl